<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//IETF//DTD HTML//EN">
<html>

<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type"
content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<meta name="GENERATOR" content="Microsoft FrontPage 2.0">
<title> Brett's Dyno Results </title>
<style type="text/css">
<!--

	A:link {text-decoration: underline;; font-weight: bold; color:"blue"; font-size:95%}
	A:visited {text-decoration: underline;; font-weight: bold; color:"darkblue";  font-size:95%}
	A:hover {text-decoration: underline;; font-weight: bold; color:"red"; font-size: 95%}
	body { font-family: arial, sans-serif; }
	h2 { font-family: arial, sans-serif;  color: "#333333"; } 
	Table {padding-right: 2pt; padding-left: 2pt;}	

-->


</style>

</b></b></head>
<!--#include virtual="/header.htm" -->

<font color="red" size="+2" face="tahoma"><b><hr><b>Brett Russo's Dyno Results</b></font></b>

</b></font><hr>

<p align="left">These are the results of the dyno testing done on
my 1993 SHO auto. The tests were done on a Dynojet 248C at Steeda
in Pompano Beach, Florida. Don't contact them as they are very
uninterested in anything to do with SHOs. All data is presented
in SAE corrected numbers, with the car in second gear. </p>

<dl>
    <dt>Run 02, baseline </dt>
    <dd>55MM MAF in stock airbox, no chip. Walker Dynomax
        cat-back exhaust, Larger flex pipe, hollow cats. </dd>
    <dt>Run 13 </dt>
    <dd>80mm MAF, my custom air box, no chip. Same exhaust
        configuration. </dd>
</dl>

<p align="center"><img src="graphs/brett_dyno.gif" width="640"
height="442"></p>

<p align="left">The 80mm unit without a cone filter or
aftermarket chip made more power and torque across the rev range.</p>

</b></font><hr>

<!--#include virtual="/footer.htm" -->
</p>
</body>
</html>
