<HTML>
<HEAD>
   <META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
   <META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="Mozilla/4.04 [en] (WinNT; I) [Netscape]">
   <TITLE>Anti-Sway Bars</title>
<style type="text/css">
<!--

	A:link {text-decoration: underline;; font-weight: bold; color:"blue"; font-size:95%}
	A:visited {text-decoration: underline;; font-weight: bold; color:"darkblue";  font-size:95%}
	A:hover {text-decoration: underline;; font-weight: bold; color:"red"; font-size: 95%}
	body { font-family: arial, sans-serif; }
	h2 { font-family: arial, sans-serif;  color: "#333333"; } 
	Table {padding-right: 2pt; padding-left: 2pt;}	

-->


</style>

<!--#include virtual="/header.htm" --> 
<font face="tahoma" color="red" size="+2"><b>
<B>Anti-Sway Bars and Bushings</B></font>

</b></font><hr>
<table cellpadding="3" BORDER=0 CELLPADDING=5 >
<TR>
<td valign=top>
<H2>
&nbsp;</H2>
</TD>

<td valign=top>There are several ways to upgrade the anti-sway bars in
your SHO. Replacement bars and bushings are readily available from the
SHO Shop and Scott Performance, among others.</TD>
</TR>

<TR>
<td valign=top>
<H2>
Stock bars</H2>
</TD>

<td valign=top>If you decide to order anti-sway bar bushings, get under
your car and measure the bars using a dial caliper or other suitable device.
Ford used several different diameters of bars within the some model years,
especially 1993. The following table (thanks John Holowczak) shows some
common bar sizes, but measure yours to be absolutely sure. Ford played
around a lot with these parts.&nbsp;
<CENTER><table cellpadding="3" BORDER CELLPADDING=5 >
<CAPTION align="top"><B>Common Stock Stabilizer Bar Diameters</B></CAPTION>

<TR>
<td valign="center">&nbsp;</TD>

<td valign="center"><B>Front</B></TD>

<td valign="center"><B>Rear</B></TD>
</TR>

<TR>
<td valign="center"><B>'89, '90, '91&nbsp;</B></TD>

<td valign="center">24mm</TD>

<td valign="center">26mm</TD>
</TR>

<TR>
<td valign="center"><B>'92, '93 5-speed</B></TD>

<td valign="center">24mm</TD>

<td valign="center">23mm</TD>
</TR>

<TR>
<td valign="center"><B>'93 auto</B></TD>

<td valign="center">23mm</TD>

<td valign="center">23mm</TD>
</TR>

<TR>
<td valign="center"><B>Most '94-'95 5-speed</B></TD>

<td valign="center">??</TD>

<td valign="center">23mm</TD>
</TR>

<TR>
<td valign=top><B>At least one early '94 auto</B></TD>

<td valign=top>23mm</TD>

<td valign=top>19mm</TD>
</TR>

<TR>
<td valign="center"><B>Most '94-'95 SHO auto, some '94-'95 SHO 5-speeds</B></TD>

<td valign="center">20.6mm</TD>

<td valign="center">21mm</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE></CENTER>
&nbsp;</TD>
</TR>

<TR>
<td valign=top>
<H2>
Bushings</H2>
</TD>

<td valign=top>Anti-sway bar bushings are available for the SHO in polyurethane.
Bushings used to be available in Delrin, but they are not available any
more.&nbsp;</TD>
</TR>

<TR>
<td valign=top>
<H2>
For autocrossers</H2>
</TD>

<td valign=top>Gary Morrell had this to say after investigating the possibilities
of a 28mm rear bar :&nbsp;

<P>Several years ago, I had ADDCO make a 1 &amp; 1/8" bar for the SHO rear
suspension. I calculated this bar to have a stiffness of about 700 pounds/inch
deflection, which would mesh nicely with the approx. 350 pound/inch 24mm
front bar. Some of the front drive handling gurus like Multimatic (builder
of the Canadian Firehawk series SHO's), felt that a 1-to-2 front-to-rear
roll stiffness ratio would perfectly balance the SHO.&nbsp;

<P>I needed a good test for this bar, so I ran the SHO at an autocross
in Denver, doing the first four runs of the course with the '89's stock
26mm rear bar. After my competition runs, the best of which was about 59
seconds, I went to the pits and changed to the larger rear bar, leaving
the rest of the car's setup unchanged. After the last run group, we did
fun runs. My first fun run on the larger bar was 0.6 seconds faster than
my fastest time earlier that day. Tho that's only a 1% improvement, autocrosses
are typically won and lost by considerably smaller margins.&nbsp;

<P>The car was much easier to drive, understeer was virtually non-existant,
and it was much easier to pivot thru tight corners. It was also easier
to keep the rear end in line with the loud pedal. The end links did indeed
bend, but that's&nbsp; because they were too short. I've since corrected
that problem.&nbsp;

<P>In the past several years, I've transitioned from autocross to road
race and Solo Trials, both much higher speed venues. For these, the larger
bar has required some fine tuning. In high speed corner entry, the larger
bar tends to transition too quickly as the body begins to lean, tending
the chassis to snap oversteer. Snap oversteer is nearly impossible to recover
from, and it once put me in the weeds at Stapleton's road course. I adjusted
to this by overslowing prior to the corner and tip-toeing thru the entry.
Midway thru the corner, I could start to add throttle and manage the oversteer
by judicious throttle application. This was definitely not an optimum situation,
as an oversteering car ("loose" in NASCAR parlance) may be slightly faster
in the hands of an expert, but it requires lots of attention and is tiring
to drive. Besides, I'm not an expert...&nbsp;

<P>I played some more with my CAD models of the SHO suspension, and plugged
some test cases into the CARS program (CARS is a race car suspension design
package). What I found was that I either needed a softer rear bar, or,
I needed to allow the body to lean 6 or 8 degrees before the rear swaybar
started to work. I tested this by just leaving the end links loose, which
actually worked quite well, but the rattling drove me nuts, so I fashioned
some longer links and used the extra length to add some fairly heavy springs
on either side of the swaybar eyes.&nbsp; These springs allow the suspension
to compress somewhat before the swaybar comes into play. The end result,
no more snap oversteer.</TD>
</TR>

<TR>
<td valign=top>
<H2>
Police package front bars</H2>
</TD>

<td valign=top>You may be tempted to try the front anti-sway bars from
the police package Taurus. If you do, you will find that you have taken
a lot of time and effort to screw up your handling. The 3.8l engine is
much heavier than the SHO engine, and thus the bars in the police package
Taurus are balanced differently. Understeer will increase appreciably,
along with body roll.</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>

</b></font><hr>

<!--#include virtual="/footer.html" --> 
</BODY>
</HTML>
