<HTML>
<HEAD>
   <META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
   <META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="Mozilla/4.04 [en] (WinNT; I) [Netscape]">
   <TITLE> Clutch and Release Bearing </title>
<style type="text/css">
<!--

	A:link {text-decoration: underline;; font-weight: bold; color:"blue"; font-size:95%}
	A:visited {text-decoration: underline;; font-weight: bold; color:"darkblue";  font-size:95%}
	A:hover {text-decoration: underline;; font-weight: bold; color:"red"; font-size: 95%}
	body { font-family: arial, sans-serif; }
	h2 { font-family: arial, sans-serif;  color: "#333333"; } 
	Table {padding-right: 2pt; padding-left: 2pt;}	

-->


</style>

<!--#include virtual="/header.htm" --> 
<font face="tahoma" color="red" size="+2"><b>
<B>Clutch and Release Bearing</B></font>

</b></font><hr>
<table cellpadding="3" BORDER=0 >
<TR>
<td valign=top>
<H2>
<B>Clutch</B></H2>
</TD>

<td valign=top>Courtesy of Gary Morrell

<P>OK, its time for some clutch education here.

<P>First, some SHO clutch history: When the SHO was about to be introduced
in late 1988, the powertrain engineers went to upper management and expressed
concern that the 9.25" clutch was a weak spot and would likely become a
warranty headache. Management said don't worry about it. By mid 1990, the
warranty pipeline was full of slipping SHO clutches and Ford ponied up
a bunch of N.R.E. money to Valeo to make a better clutch for the application,
the only caveats being that the bell housing could not be enlarged and
that retrofit to earlier SHO's would be possible.

<P>The result was the 9.75" clutch that debuted in the 1991 SHO's. Here's
what was changed:&nbsp;
<OL type="1">
<LI>
The diameter of the disk and pressure plate was increased by 0.5", increasing
the total friction material area by about 22%, accounting for both sides.&nbsp;</LI>

<LI>
The stamped steel cover was replaced by a much stiffer ( and heavier )
cast iron cover. A stiffer cover is better at keeping clamp loads consistant.&nbsp;</LI>

<LI>
The clamp load on the friction materials was increased by about 40%.&nbsp;</LI>

<LI>
The cover was located on the flywheel by 3 steel dowel pins, in addition
to 6 bolts, making for a much stronger assembly, this necessitated changing
the flywheel.&nbsp;</LI>
</OL>
This clutch is an orphan: it has NO other applications, and shares parts
with NO other clutches in the Valeo line, which BTW, is quite extensive,
comprising large OEM markets in Europe and North America. Consequently,
the only place to buy parts for this clutch is from Valeo, its distributors,
or from Ford. If you buy it from Ford, the box says 'Made in France', which
is where most of Valeo's manufacturing is located. In fact, Valeo does
not sell parts, only a complete assembly, consisting of cover, pressure
plate, and diaphram, along with a separate disk assembly. Fitchel and Sachs,
a major German clutch manufacturer, sells a clutch for the SHO, their applications
people freely admitted to me that they just buy the Valeo clutch and rebox
it.

<P>There are several ways to improve on the current clutch:&nbsp;
<OL type="1">
<LI>
Change the friction materials from organic to some other material, such
as semi-metallic ceramic (Steve Hazard's Grizzly Paw), or Kevlar (SHO Shop,
Grizzly OEM Replacement). Both of these materials have higher coefficients
of friction than the stock material and will therefore be able to transmit
more HP without slipping. A minor downside of these materials is that they
can be quite 'grabby', making smooth engagement and takeoff quite a learning
experience. They will also wear the pressure plate and flywheel surfaces
faster. Additionally, high tech friction materials are quite a bit more
expensive. There is no free lunch.&nbsp;</LI>

<LI>
Increase the clamp load on the friction materials, this also will increase
the HP handling ability of the clutch, with a slight increase in pedal
effort. There are several ways to do this:&nbsp;</LI>

<OL type="1">
<LI>
changing the diaphragm pivot points on the pressure plate (kinda' hard,
requires re-machining the pressure plate),&nbsp;</LI>

<LI>
changing to a stronger diaphram spring; to my knowledge, and Valeo's, one
is not available, or,&nbsp;</LI>

<LI>
installing a shim between the pressure plate and the diaphram, This is
OK to do as long as the 'drop' measurement of the diaphram fingers doesn't
go too deep, if it does, then the release bearing can't stroke the diaphram
far enough to fully disengage the pressure plate and release the clutch.&nbsp;</LI>
</OL>

<LI>
Increase the strength of the torque straps and rivets, this is where most
of us with high HP cars are tearing things up. The torque straps are what
transmit engine torque from the pressure plate to the clutch cover, they
allow the pressure plate to move in and out to engage/disengage the clutch,
and they locate and center the pressure plate within the cover. High RPM
shifts can de-head the soft steel rivets that secure the straps or pull
the rivets right out of the pressure plate iron. Aggressive friction materials
also create problems because they drastically increase the shock loads
on the straps and rivets. Huge straps are not the answer either because
the strap stiffness and spring constant must be properly matched to the
diaphram strength and pressure plate mass, otherwise the clutch could chatter
on engagement or the straps would fight the diaphram, reducing the clamp
load. Steve Hazard's fabricator has changed to a very strong, stainless
steel rivet, which seems to have fixed the rivet strength problem.&nbsp;</LI>
</OL>
Hopefully, this has not bored you but has increased your appreciation of
the pain and development expense that Vadim and Steve have gone through
to improve the stock SHO clutch. Either of their offerings will certainly
last longer and tolerate more HP than the Ford replacement.
<BR>&nbsp;</TD>
</TR>

<TR>
<td valign=top>
<H2>
<B>Release Bearing</B></H2>
</TD>

<td valign=top>There are essentially two release bearings (aka throw-out
bearings) available for the SHO: the OEM Ford bearing and the NESHOC Grizzly
Paw bearing.
<H3>
<B>Ford Bearing</B></H3>
The original stock bearing used in the earliest SHOs rode on the aluminum
quill shaft in the transmission case. This steel bearing would gall the
shaft, causing the bearing to bind up and ruin the clutch assembly.

<P>In 1993, Ford updated the bearing to include a steel sleeve that slides
over the aluminum quill shaft, providing a steel surface for the steel
bearing to ride against. Unfortunately, it appears that under some use
conditions this bearing can become clogged with clutch dust and binds up,
causing the bearing to bind up and ruin the clutch assembly. This revised
bearing is a dry lubricated ball bearing with a plastic separator for the
balls. Extended high RPM operation will cook this bearing, it gets hard
to turn, and buzz-saws its way thru the diaphragm fingers, ruining the
clutch assembly.
<H3>
<B>NESHOC Grizzly Paw Bearing</B></H3>
This bearing is alleged to solve all of the problems, the earlier models
had some failures, but the current version of it is highly touted by the
vendors.&nbsp; It is a high-speed sealed, greased ball bearing without
ball separators.</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>

</b></font><hr>
<!--#include virtual="/footer.html" --> 
</BODY>
</HTML>
