<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
<head>
   <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
   <meta name="GENERATOR" content="Mozilla/4.6 [en] (WinNT; U) [Netscape]">
   <title> MAF Sensors </title>
<style type="text/css">
<!--

	A:link {text-decoration: underline;; font-weight: bold; color:"blue"; font-size:95%}
	A:visited {text-decoration: underline;; font-weight: bold; color:"darkblue";  font-size:95%}
	A:hover {text-decoration: underline;; font-weight: bold; color:"red"; font-size: 95%}
	body { font-family: arial, sans-serif; }
	h2 { font-family: arial, sans-serif;  color: "#333333"; } 
	Table {padding-right: 2pt; padding-left: 2pt;}	

-->


</style>

</b></b></head>
<!--#include virtual="/header.htm" --> 

<font face="tahoma" color="red" size="+2"><b>
<b>MAF Sensors/Air Filters</b></font></b>

</b></font><hr>
<table cellpadding="3" BORDER=0 cellpadding="4" >
  <tr>
<td valign=top>
      <h2> <b><font face="Tahoma">MAF Sensors</font></b></h2>
</td>

<td valign=top>In order to inject the proper amount of fuel, the computer
needs to measure the quantity of air flowing into the engine. The device
which does this is called a mass air flow sensor, or MAF. That's the aluminum
device mounted on the air cleaner cover with a black box atop it.&nbsp;
<p>Ford designed the meter to serve dual purposes; in addition to measuring
airflow, it actually makes the intake system quieter. The next time you
have the air cleaner box open, look at the inside of the MAF. See where
the main tube diameter gets much smaller? Ford deliberately put a discontinuity
there to create a <i>reflection coefficient</i>; in plain English, the
noise of intake valves opening and closing is partially reflected back
into the intake manifold, with less of it transmitted to the outside world.&nbsp;
      <p>Unfortunately, the same discontinuity that makes the engine quieter also sharply 
        restricts the maximum airflow into the engine. In order to realize significant 
        power gains at high rpm's, the stock MAF needs to be replaced with a higher-flow 
        unit. Several aftermarket replacements exist for the stock unit, many 
        of which use the stock sensor electronics. Some list subscribers have 
        also reported good results from boring the stock (55mm diameter) unit 
        out to 60mm or so.&nbsp; <br>
        <br>
        You can expect (hope for) gains of about 5 - 10HP at the front wheels 
        with the aftermarket MAFs available for the SHO today. As with most of 
        the bolt-ons available for the SHO, you never know how your SHO will react 
        to a larger mass airflow sensor. Some SHOs just don't seem to like 'em.
      <p>WARNING: Rumors persist that you can use the 71mm MAF for a T- Bird
SC in the SHO unmodified. <b>DON'T DO IT.</b> According to Ford Motorsport's
tech guys, the calibrations are much different, and the T-Bird sensor will
cause the engine to run much too lean and the timing will retard to prevent
knocking. It will adversely affect the long-term life of your SHO engine.</td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td valign=top>
      <h2> <b><font face="Tahoma">The importance of quality</font></b></h2>
</td>

<td valign=top>Ted Breaux's opinion:&nbsp;
<p>A MAF is sensitive to the way air flows through the unit. This can be
changed merely by altering the physical position of the MAF under the hood
(if you have a cone filter)! If you don't believe you can change the way
your car runs by turning your MAF 90 degrees in the plane of the ground,
just try it!! Since a MAF is the ONLY method of determining proper fuel
metering under wide open throttle, your fuel metering will only be as accurate
as your air metering. Some MAFs have a more linear response curve than
others, and this is usually measured via a flow bench with MAF, hotwire
assembly, and air filter in place. This is why if you swap hotwire assemblies
and use the factory airbox, only by sheer luck would you have the exact
proper response curve. I have never believed it a good practice, swapping
your factory hotwire on a different MAF sensor. In addition, you still
end up with the source of error being the way you position the sensor (i.e.
the way air flows through it). In my opinion, these are good reasons why
some SHOs do not seem quite as 'peppy' as others. On the other hand, if
you have a good, linear MAF sensor which has been properly calibrated,
regardless of whether it is 55mm, 73mm, or 80mm, the car will run properly
at WOT. This is more important than the static diameter of the MAF itself
(within reason of course), although this variable can hurt you equally
if it is too small or too large.&nbsp;
<p>Also, I believe that the passages both to and from the MAF should be
as turbulence free as possible.&nbsp;</td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td valign=top>
      <h2> <b><font face="Tahoma">Alternatives</font></b></h2>
</td>

<td valign=top>
      <table cellpadding="3" BORDER=0 CELLPADDING=4 >
        <tr> 
          <th VALIGN=TOP><a href="http://www.cnlperformance.com/73maf.html" target="blank">C&amp;L 
            73mm</a>&nbsp;</th>
          <td valign=top>$175-190 street. Uses stock sensor electronics. The SHO 
            sample tube will run a little lean and cause a loss of mid-range power. 
            This can be solved buy using the Mustang 19 lb/hr sample tube in its 
            place.&nbsp;</td>
        </tr>
        <tr> 
          <th VALIGN=TOP><a href="http://www.pro-flow.com/bullet.html" target="blank">Pro-M Bullet 
            75mm</a></th>
          <td valign=top>$250 street plus core charge. Properly calibrated for 
            stock engines. Uses stock air box and filter.&nbsp;</td>
        </tr>
        <tr> 
          <th VALIGN=TOP><a href="http://www.pro-flow.com/prom.html" target="blank">Pro-M 77mm</a></th>
          <td valign=top>about $575, properly calibrated for stock engines. Comes 
            with a high-flow conical K&amp;N air filter. An excellent MAF for 
            highly modified engines. Includes provisions for mounting the air 
            intake temperature sensor (the sensor that goes into the side of the 
            stock air box, before the air filter).&nbsp;</td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
          <th VALIGN=TOP>Pro-M 80mm</th>
          <td valign=top>Properly calibrated for stock engines. Available from 
            SP Motorsports (<a href="www.spmotorsports.com" target="_blank">www.spmotorsports.com</a>). 
            A possible replacement for the 80mm MAF / LPM combo?</td>
        </tr>
        <tr> 
          <th VALIGN=TOP>SHO Shop 80mm&nbsp;</th>
          <td valign=top>$325. This is the MAF from the Lincoln Mark VIII's 4.6L 
            DOHC V8. Requires a chip (LPM). Comes with a high-flow conical K&amp;N 
            air filter. A budget alternative to the Pro-M 77mm if you intend to 
            buy an LPM anyway. No provisions for mounting the air charge temperature 
            (ACT) sensor are provided. The Can, also available from the SHO Shop, 
            provides an ACT mounting.</td>
        </tr>
        <tr> 
          <th VALIGN=TOP>Kenne-Belle 80mm</th>
          <td valign=top>(Price?) This is the same MAF as the SHO Shop 80mm, but 
            it doesn't come with a conical K&amp;N. Here's how to adapt it to 
            the stock air box:&nbsp; 
            <p>The stock air box has a 4" outlet that is reduced for the stock 
              55mm MAF. Remove the step down ring. Remove the stock MAF from the 
              air box lid. Plug up the bolt holes. Get strong 4 inch flex duct 
              and connect the meter to the box. Get 3.5 inch flex duct to connect 
              the rear of the meter to the throttle body. Make sure you keep the 
              larger distance between the TB and the MAF, or you will haave idle 
              problems. Get some nice wide T-bolt clamps to bolt it all together 
              nicely.&nbsp;
          </td>
        </tr>
      </table>
NOTE: The stock MAF sensor is equipped with a screen, presumably to prevent
the mounting bolts from being drawn into the engine should they work loose.
Other units have no such screen, and Loctite 271 (the heavy duty stuff)
doesn't really do much to bond the brass bolts to the aluminum sensor body.</td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td valign=top>
      <h2> <b><font face="Tahoma">Air Filter Box and Silencer Cone</font></b></h2>
</td>

<td valign=top>A common trick on Mustang 5.0's which also works on the
SHO is to remove the inlet resonator, which is mounted inside the left
fender. This gadget exists solely to attenuate noise. Removing this device
will make your car noticably louder. As it is a bit of an obstruction for
a suitably modified intake, removing it may provide a bit more flow (I
recall seeing something about 5-7 HP worth on the 5.0; I'd guess less than
that on the SHO). The factory manual contains instructions for removal,
or you can follow the link below.&nbsp;
<p><a href="SHO4airbox.html">How to remove the air box silencer cone</a>
<p>Drilling holes in the stock air box (below the filter, please) is not
recommended because any new air flow that is provided (which will be virtually
negligible) will be offset by an increase in the air charge temperature.
<h3>
<b>The Horn</b></h3>
The SHO Shop offers a replacement for the air box silencer called The Horn
($80). It bolts in place of the silencer with its much larger opening in
a high pressure area in the left front fender, and a nice smooth bend leading
to the air box.
<h3>
<b>The Can</b></h3>
One of the problems with the conical air filters that come with the Pro-M
77mm MAF and the SHO Shop 80mm MAF is the engine ingests hot engine compartment
air. The SHO Shop offers an air box called The Can ($120) that goes over
the conical air filter, allowing the engine to draw in cooler outside air.
The Can also provides a mounting point for the air intake temperature sensor
for users of the SHO Shop 80mm MAF.&nbsp;</td>
</tr>
</table>

</b></font><hr>
<!--#include virtual="/footer.html" --> 
</body>
</html>
